But stadium backers note the bonds have already survived similar legal challenges, and maintain that inability to sell bonds soon would imperil not just the stadium project but an adjacent $400 million public/private development that includes office towers, parking facilities and green space.
The state Supreme Court "should dispose of the claims raised once and for all," stated the Sports Facilities Authority brief. The authority argued that the remedy sought by the plaintiffs, what's called a "writ of prohibition" against selling the bonds,Wholesale Shoes Uk Cheap, is not even within the authority of the high court to order because such writs govern the exercise of judicial power. Selling bonds is administrative rather than judicial in nature, the authority argued.